Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 19:30

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
UNAIDS Executive Director: ‘The HIV Response Is in Crisis’ - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can I showcase AI usage, like OpenAI or Claude AI, in my job application process?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Michael Altenhofen Is NASA Deputy Chief of Staff - NASA Watch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Firefly's Blue Ghost On Moon Seen By Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - MSN
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
U.C. Berkeley's Tiny Pogo Robot has a Unique Locomotion Style - Core77
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Would Donald Trump's reelection make the world more dangerous?
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.